 |
 | Little Rock, AR Real Estate Blog |
 |
|
Monday, 18 January 2010
As the temperature drops and the snow piles up, it's easy to forget that spring is quickly approaching. And after more than three years of a painful housing swoon, real estate experts predict that lower prices, attractive mortgage rates, and a tax perk from Uncle Sam will create the most vibrant spring home selling season in some time. "This is going to be probably the most pleasant experience for a home seller in the last four or five years," says Mike Larson of Weiss Research. "If you have been beating your head against a wall, this is going to feel a lot better." But even if the market does perk up, buyers are likely to retain the upper hand throughout 2010. So to help property owners get the best selling price they can--without burying themselves in expenses--U.S. News has created a list of 10 cheap ways to boost a home's sales price by spring:
1. Retouch the front shell
If your property's exterior isn't appealing, no one will want to see your newly remodeled kitchen. So property sellers must first ensure that their home projects a cozy, inviting feeling. "The shell--the outside front--is probably the most important area for improvement, the area where you can make the biggest improvement with the smallest amount of cash," says Pat Lashinsky, the president and CEO of ZipRealty. Touching up the paint on the front-entry portion of the house can be an inexpensive but effective way to make the entire property more inviting, Lashinsky says. "Really focus on that outside, external shell," he says. "You would be amazed by the amount of people that drive by a house and say, 'Ah, that's not for me.' And they can tell just by the way the upkeep and the outside looks.
2. Trim the greenery
Ensuring that the lawn, hedges, and flowers are well maintained helps make your home more alluring to prospective buyers as well. Property owners can hire professional landscapers or break out the lawn mower and get busy themselves. "Many people have landscaping that is overgrown and too heavy, and it is concealing a lot of the house," says Paul Zuch, the president of Capital Improvements. "Trim the trees, trim the hedges ... [and] add a little color to the flower beds."
3. Paint the interior
Putting a fresh coat of paint on the home's interior is a cost-effective way for sellers to make their home more appealing to buyers, says Ron Phipps, a broker with Phipps Realty in Warwick, R.I. But when choosing the color, homeowners should be conservative. "The caution is that your favorite color may not be the favorite color of the buyer." Instead, homeowners are best off using neutral colors, Phipps says. "Go with something that is a very light yellow or a light cream with a contrasting white, so it just looks very fresh and crisp . ... Having the paint in good condition is almost more important than the color."
4. Don't forget the floors
Improving the condition of a home's flooring is also a smart move for sellers--and you don't need to refinish wood floors or install new carpets to make them more attractive. "If it's a hardwood [floor], has the floor been buffed?" says David Lupberger, a home improvement expert with ServiceMagic.com. "If you have carpets, have the carpets been cleaned?"
5. Make all major repairs
Because tighter lending standards demand higher down payments, today's home buyers won't have much cash left over for improvements once they've made their purchase. So it's imperative for sellers to make all major home repairs--fixing the leaky roof, rebuilding the front stoop--before they put the property on the market. "Repairs can't be ignored, because nobody has any extra money," Phipps says. To determine what needs to be done, property owners can scrutinize their homes themselves or bring in a home inspector to examine the property professionally. "The home inspection piece I think is something that is a huge value, particularly if there is something that is a question," Phipps says.
6. Put appliances under warranty
To give buyers more confidence in a home's appliances, Phipps recommends that sellers put them under warranty. Sellers can buy home warranties--which cover repair and replacement costs for many home appliances--from several different firms. "If I have got a 40- or 50-year-old house, it is going to be harder for me to persuade a first-time home buyer with a limited amount of cash to buy it because they will say, 'Well, what happens if something breaks down?' " Phipps says. "If I have a home warranty ... that solves that problem."
7. Make energy-efficient home improvements
Increasing your home's energy efficiency is another good way to make your property more attractive to buyers. Many such improvements--such as new windows or better insulation--come with federal tax benefits. In addition, a growing awareness of human impact on the environment means homes that have these upgrades will stand out from other listings. "If you have some cruddy old windows that are leaky and just not energy efficient, you can put in new replacement windows and take advantage of the tax credit," Zuch says. "It's not green washing. Those are really practical things that make your house more sellable." Many contractors will conduct a so-called energy audit free of charge to determine where efficiencies can be created, Zuch says. "If your house is more energy efficient-you use less energy, it's better insulated-it is going to be more desirable for a potential buyer," he says.
8. New light fixtures
Replacing old or broken light fixtures with new ones can also be a low-cost way to add value, Lupberger says. Installing a nice new light fixture in the foyer near the home's entrance can be a particular benefit, he said, because it can make a strong first impression on would-be buyers. Creating an inviting feeling in the interior entryway, in turn, helps get home shoppers more interested in checking out the rest of the property. "I am not going to redo the house," Lupberger says. "But I can update those features so that somebody can walk in and say, 'You know what? [the homeowners] took care of this.'"
9. New stove in the kitchen
While some homeowners might think the only way to jazz up a dated kitchen is a full-on remodeling job, Lashinsky recommends a much less costly alternative: buying a new stove. "If there is an updated stove in the kitchen, it is amazing how that draws people in, and people say, 'Wow, this kitchen is going to be great,' " Lashinsky says. While upscale homeowners may have to shell out for top-of-the-line appliances to maintain their kitchen's décor, others can budget well under $1,000 for the upgrade. "You can get a really nice stove for $700 or $800," Lashinsky says. "You can basically have the look of a new kitchen that is going to be really enticing to someone-and what you are really trying to do is differentiate your house from somebody else's."
Property owners in neighborhoods where most homes have granite countertops can consider making this upgrade as well. But Lupberger says the project makes sense only for homeowners with extremely dated kitchens that are going to serve as a serious impediment to finding a buyer. A real estate agent with experience in the local market can help you determine whether or not the upgrade is essential, he says.
10. Freshen up the bathrooms
Getting rid of mildew stains on the bathroom caulking can boost a home's appeal as well. Such stains "scream, 'These people haven't taken care of this house. It's going to be a money pit,' " Zuch says. Use a razor blade to remove the old caulk, and replace it with new, mildew-resistant caulk, Zuch says. And rather than remodeling the entire space, homeowners can reinvigorate a worn-down bathroom by replacing cracked sinks, Lupberger says.
Source: Luke Mullins, USNews.com
Wednesday, 15 April 2009
Frequently Asked Questions
In 2008, Congress enacted a $7500 tax credit designed to be an incentive for first-time homebuyers to purchase a home. The credit was designed as a mechanism to decrease the over-supply of homes for sale.
For 2009, Congress has increased the credit to $8000 and made several additional improvements. This revised $8000 tax credit applies to purchases on or after January 1, 2009 and before December 1, 2009.
Tax Credits -- The Basics
1. What’s this new homebuyer tax incentive for 2009?
The 2008 $7500, repayable credit is increased to $8000 and the repayment feature is eliminated for 2009 purchasers. Any home that is purchased for $80,000 or more qualifies for the full $8000 amount. If the house costs less than $80,000, the credit will be 10% of the cost. Thus, if an individual purchased a home for $75,000, the credit would be $7500. It is available for the purchase of a principal residence on or after January 1, 2009 and before December 1, 2009.
2. Who is eligible?
Only first-time homebuyers are eligible. A person is considered a first-time buyer if he/she has not had any ownership interest in a home in the three years previous to the day of the 2009 purchase.
3. How does a tax credit work?
Every dollar of a tax credit reduces income taxes by a dollar. Credits are claimed on an individual’s income tax return. Thus, a qualified purchaser would figure out all the income items and exemptions and make all the calculations required to figure out his/her total tax due. Then, once the total tax owed has been computed, tax credits are applied to reduce the total tax bill. So, if before taking any credits on a tax return a person has total tax liability of $9500, an $8000 credit would wipe out all but $1500 of the tax due. ($9,500 - $8000 = $1500)
4. So what happens if the purchaser is eligible for an $8000 credit but their entire income tax liability for the year is only $6000?
This tax credit is what’s called “refundable” credit. Thus, if the eligible purchaser’s total tax liability was
$6000, the IRS would send the purchaser a check for $2000. The refundable amount is the difference between $8000 credit amount and the amount of tax liability. ($8000 - $6000 = $2000) Most taxpayers determine their tax liability by referring to tables that the IRS prepares each year.
5. How does withholding affect my tax credit and my refund?
A few examples are provided at the end of this document. There are several steps in this calculation, but most income tax software programs are equipped to make that determination.
6. Is there an income restriction?
Yes. The income restriction is based on the tax filing status the purchaser claims when filing his/her income tax return. Individuals filing Form 1040 as Single (or Head of Household) are eligible for the
credit if their income is no more than $75,000. Married couples who file a Joint return may have income of no more than $150,000.
7. How is my “income” determined?
For most individuals, income is defined and calculated in the same manner as their Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) on their 1040 income tax return. AGI includes items like wages, salaries, interest and dividends, pension and retirement earnings, rental income and a host of other elements. AGI is the final number that appears on the bottom line of the front page of an IRS Form 1040.
8. What if I worked abroad for part of the year?
Some individuals have earned income and/or receive housing allowances while working outside the US. Their income will be adjusted to reflect those items to measure Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI). Their eligibility for the credit will be based on their MAGI.
9. Do individuals with incomes higher than the $75,000 or $150,000 limits lose all the benefit of the credit?
Not always. The credit phases-out between $75,000 - $95,000 for singles and $150,000 - $170,000 for married filing joint. The closer a buyer comes to the maximum phase-out amount, the smaller the credit will be. The law provides a formula to gradually withdraw the credit. Thus, the credit will disappear
after an individual’s income reaches $95,000 (single return) or $170,000 (joint return).
For example, if a married couple had income of $165,000, their credit would be reduced by 75% as shown:
Couple’s income $165,000
Income limit 150,000
Excess income $15,000
The excess income amount ($15,000 in this example) is used to form a fraction. The numerator of the fraction is the excess income amount ($15,000). The denominator is $20,000 (specified by the statute).
In this example, the disallowed portion of the credit is 75% of $8000, or $6000 ($15,000/$20,000 = 75% x $8000 = $6000)
Stated another way, only 25% of the credit amount would be allowed.
In this example, the allowable credit would be $2000 (25% x $8000 = $2000)
10. What’s the definition of “principal residence?”
Generally, a principal residence is the home where an individual spends most of his/her time (generally defined as more than 50%). It is also defined as “owner-occupied” housing. The term includes single- family detached housing, condos or co-ops, townhouses or any similar type of new or existing dwelling. Even some houseboats or manufactured homes count as principal residences.
11. Are there restrictions on the location of the property?
Yes. The home must be located in the United States. Property located outside the US is not eligible for the credit.
12. Are there restrictions related to the financing for the mortgage on the property?
In 2009, most financing arrangements are acceptable and will not affect eligibility for the credit. Congress eliminated the financing restriction that applied in 2008. (In 2008, purchasers were ineligible for the $7500 credit if the financing was obtained by means of mortgage revenue bonds.) Now, mortgage-revenue bond financing will not disqualify an otherwise-eligible purchaser. (Mortgage revenue bonds are tax-exempt bonds issued by a state housing agency. Proceeds from the bonds must be used for below market loans to qualified buyers.)
13. Do I have to repay the 2009 tax credit?
NO. There is no repayment for 2009 tax credits.
14. Do 2008 purchasers still have to repay their tax credit?
YES. The $7500 credit in 2008 was more like an interest-free loan. All eligible purchasers who claimed the 2008 credit will still be required to repay it over 15 years, starting with their 2010 tax return.
Some Practical Questions
15. How do I apply for the credit?
There is no pre-purchase authorization, application or similar approval process. All eligible purchasers simply claim the credit on their IRS Form 1040 tax return. The credit will be reflected on a new Form
5405 that will be attached to the 1040. Form 5405 can be found at www.irs.gov.
16. So I can’t use the credit amount as part of my downpayment?
No. Congress tried hard to devise a mechanism that would make the funds available for closing costs, but found that pre-funding would require cumbersome processes that would, in effect, bring the IRS into the purchase and settlement phase of the transaction.
17. So there’s no way to get any cash flow benefits before I file my tax return?
Yes, there is. Any first-time homebuyers who believe they are eligible for all or part of the credit can modify their income tax withholding (through their employers) or adjust their quarterly estimated tax payments. Individuals subject to income tax withholding would get an IRS Form W-4 from their employer, follow the instructions on the schedules provided and give the completed Form W-4 back to the employer. In many cases their withholding would decrease and their take-home pay would increase. Those who make estimated tax payments would make similar adjustments.
Some “Real World” Examples
18. What if I purchase later this year but can’t get to settlement before December 1?
The credit is available for purchases before December 1, 2009. A home is considered as “purchased” when all events have occurred that transfer the title from the seller to the new purchaser. Thus, closings must occur before December 1, 2009 for purchases to be eligible for the credit.
19. I haven’t even filed my 2008 tax return yet. If I buy in 2009, do I have to wait until next year to get the benefit of the credit?
You’ll have a helpful choice that might speed up the process. Eligible homebuyers who make their purchase between January 1, 2009 and December 1, 2009 can treat the purchase as if it had occurred on December 31, 2008. Thus, they can claim the credit on their 2008 tax return that is due on April 15,
2009. They actually have three filing options.
If they purchase between January 1, 2009 and April 15, 2009, they can claim the $8000 credit on the 2008 return due on April 15. They can extend their 2008 income-tax filing until as late as October 15, 2009. (The IRS grants automatic extensions, but the taxpayer must file for the extension. See www.irs.gov for instructions on how to obtain an extension.) If they have filed their 2008 return before they purchase the home, they may file an amended 2008 tax return on Form 1040X. (Form 1040X is available at www.irs.gov)
Of course, 2009 purchasers will always have the option of claiming the credit for the 2009 purchase on their 2009 return. Their 2009 tax return is due on April 15, 2010.
20. I purchased my home in early 2009 before the stimulus bill was enacted. I claimed a $7500 tax credit on my 2008 return as prior law had permitted. Am I restricted to just a $7500 credit?
No, you would qualify for the $8000 credit. Eligible purchasers who have already claimed the $7500 credit on a 2008 return for a 2009 purchase may file an amended return (IRS Form 1040X) for the 2008 tax year. This amended return will enable them to obtain the additional $500 credit amount.
21. If I claim my 2009 $8000 credit on my 2008 tax return, will I have to repay the credit just as the
2008 credits are repaid?
No. Congress anticipated this confusion and has made specific provision so that there would be no repayment of 2009 credits that are claimed on 2008 returns.
22. I made an eligible purchase of a principal residence in May 2008 and claimed the $7500 credit on my 2008 tax return. My brother, who has never owned a home, wishes to purchase a partial interest in the home this spring and move in. Will he qualify for the $8000 credit, as well?
No. Any purchase of a principal residence (or interest in a principal residence) from a related party such as a sibling, parent, grandparent, aunt or uncle is ineligible for the tax credit. Since you and your brother are related in this way, he cannot qualify for the credit on any portion of the home that he purchases from you, even if he is a first-time homebuyer.
23. I live in the District of Columbia. If I qualify as a first-time homebuyer, can I use both the $5000
DC credit and the $8000 credit?
No; double dipping is not allowed. You would be eligible for only the $8000 credit. This will be an advantage because of the higher credit amount, plus the eligibility requirements for the $8000 credit are somewhat more easily satisfied than the DC credit.
24. I know there is no repayment requirement for the $8000 credit. Will I ever have to repay any of the credit back to the government?
One situation does require a recapture payment back to the government. If you claim the credit but then sell the property within 3 years of the date of purchase, you are required to pay back the full amount of any credit, including any refund you received from it. A few exceptions apply. (See below,
#24). Note that this same 3-year recapture rule applies, as well, to the $7500 credit available for 2008.
This provision is designed as an anti-flipping rule.
25. What if I die or get divorced or my property is ruined in a natural disaster within the 3 years?
The repayment rules are eased for many circumstances. If the homeowner who used the credit dies within the first three years of ownership, there is no recapture. Special rules make adjustments for people who sell homes as part of a divorce settlement, as well. Similarly, adjustments are made in the case of a home that is part of an involuntary conversion (property is destroyed in a natural disaster or subject to condemnation by eminent domain by an authorized agency) within the first three years.
26. I have a home under construction. Am I eligible for the credit?
Yes, so long as you actually occupy the home before December 1, 2009.
WITHHOLDING EXAMPLES:
Note: The impact of estimated tax payments would be the same.
Situation 1: Sally plans her withholding so that her withholding is as close as possible to what she anticipates as her income tax liability for the year. When she fills out her 1040, her liability is $6000. She has had $6000 withheld from her paycheck. She also qualifies for the $8000 homebuyer credit.
Result: Sally’s withholding satisfies her tax liability and reduces it to zero. She will receive a refund of the full $8000.
Situation 2: Nick and Nora file a joint return. Nick is self-employed and makes estimated payments; Nora has taxes withheld from her salary. When they compute their taxes, their combined withholding and estimated tax payments are $11,000. Their income tax liability is $9800. They also qualified as first- time homebuyers and are eligible for the $8000 refundable tax credit.
Result: Ordinarily, their combined estimated tax payments and withholding would make them eligible for a refund of $1200 ($11,000 - $9800 = $1200). Because they are eligible for the refundable tax credit as well, they will receive a refund of $9200 ($1200 income tax refund + $8000 refundable tax credit =
$9200)
Situation 3: Cesar and LuzMaria both have income taxes withheld from their salaries and file a joint return. When they file their income tax return, their combined withholding is $5000. However, their total tax liability is $7200, generating an additional income tax liability of $2200 ($7200 - $5000). They also qualify for the $8000 first-time homebuyer tax credit.
Result: Cesar and LuzMaria have been under-withheld by $2200. Ordinarily, they would be required to pay the additional $2200 they owe (plus any applicable interest and penalties). Because they are eligible for the refundable homebuyer tax credit, the credit will cover the $2200 additional liability. In addition, they will receive an income tax refund of $5800 ($8000 - $2200 = $5800). If they owed penalties and/or interest, that amount would reduce the refund.
Tuesday, 27 January 2009
The numbers in the chart below represent Pulaski County’s Active Listings, Listings Under Contract, and Sold Listings during the month of December. Pulaski County’s absorption rate is 9.9 right now. Absorption Rate is determined by dividing the total number of Listings by the Solds in any one month period. Absorption Rate tells us that if nothing else were Listed and Market Conditions stayed the same, it would take consumers (9.9 months) to absorb all of the Listing inventory. Homes in December of 2008 in Pulaski County sold for 95.9% of the list price.
|
|
|
December 2008 Market Analysis - Pulaski County (Sold Homes Data - 12/1/2008 - 12/31/2008)
|
|
|
Status
|
Class
|
Type
|
Area
|
No. of Listings
|
Dollar Volume
|
Average Price
|
Median Price
|
Average DOM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Listings
|
2742
|
$662,004,170
|
$241,431
|
$174,900
|
140
|
|
Listings Under Contract
|
338
|
$67,360,934
|
$199,293
|
$136,750
|
79
|
|
Listings Sold Dec. 2008
|
277
|
$41,925,522
|
$151,356
|
$132,000
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condo/Townhse/Duplex/Apt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LITTLE ROCK (DOWNTOWN)
|
1
|
$18,000
|
$18,000
|
$18,000
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
LITTLE ROCK (HEIGHTS/HILLCREST)
|
2
|
$294,889
|
$147,445
|
$147,445
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - WEST LITTLE ROCK (NORTH)
|
2
|
$279,000
|
$139,500
|
$139,500
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - WEST LITTLE ROCK (NORTHWEST)
|
3
|
$449,900
|
$149,967
|
$173,000
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
MAUMELLE
|
1
|
$81,500
|
$81,500
|
$81,500
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total
|
9
|
$1,123,289
|
$124,810
|
$138,000
|
74
|
|
|
|
Detached
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LITTLE ROCK (EAST)
|
1
|
$2,000
|
$2,000
|
$2,000
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
LITTLE ROCK (DOWNTOWN)
|
6
|
$557,500
|
$92,917
|
$51,000
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
LITTLE ROCK (HEIGHTS/HILLCREST)
|
15
|
$3,414,100
|
$227,607
|
$176,000
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
LITTLE ROCK (UALR)
|
6
|
$223,650
|
$37,275
|
$41,375
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - WEST LITTLE ROCK (NORTH)
|
17
|
$2,379,700
|
$139,982
|
$144,000
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - WEST LITTLE ROCK (CENTRAL)
|
11
|
$1,220,847
|
$110,986
|
$88,700
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - WEST LITTLE ROCK (NORTHWEST)
|
30
|
$7,343,900
|
$244,797
|
$182,450
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - SOUTHWEST LITTLE ROCK (CENTRAL)
|
11
|
$731,801
|
$66,527
|
$65,000
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - SOUTHWEST LITTLE ROCK (SOUTH)
|
12
|
$956,350
|
$79,696
|
$84,075
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
NORTH LITTLE ROCK (WEST/CRYSTAL HILL)
|
13
|
$1,059,968
|
$81,536
|
$75,000
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
North Little Rock (CENTRAL)
|
19
|
$3,089,401
|
$162,600
|
$130,000
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
NORTH LITTLE ROCK (DOWNTOWN/EAST)
|
13
|
$1,088,001
|
$83,692
|
$33,000
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
JACKSONVILLE
|
18
|
$2,024,700
|
$112,483
|
$117,950
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
BENTON
|
1
|
$120,000
|
$120,000
|
$120,000
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
PULASKI COUNTY WEST
|
9
|
$2,727,600
|
$303,067
|
$320,000
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
MAUMELLE
|
22
|
$4,931,800
|
$224,173
|
$235,000
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
PULASKI COUNTY (EAST)
|
1
|
$56,900
|
$56,900
|
$56,900
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - OTTER CREEK, WESTFIELD & SURROUNDING AREAS
|
7
|
$1,062,600
|
$151,800
|
$149,900
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
SHERWOOD
|
36
|
$5,264,300
|
$146,231
|
$131,000
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
PULASKI COUNTY (NORTH)
|
3
|
$256,485
|
$85,495
|
$87,685
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
SHERIDAN SCHOOLS (SALINE COUNTY)
|
1
|
$107,100
|
$107,100
|
$107,100
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
NORTH LITTLE ROCK - EAST OF I-440 TO LONOKE CTY LINE
|
2
|
$377,900
|
$188,950
|
$188,950
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total
|
254
|
$38,996,603
|
$153,530
|
$133,250
|
92
|
|
|
|
Mobile/Mod/Mfg w/Property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JACKSONVILLE
|
1
|
$34,000
|
$34,000
|
$34,000
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
CABOT SCHOOL DISTRICT
|
1
|
$44,500
|
$44,500
|
$44,500
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total
|
2
|
$78,500
|
$39,250
|
$39,250
|
71
|
|
|
|
Rural Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCOTT AR AND PCSSD EAST
|
1
|
$119,500
|
$119,500
|
$119,500
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total
|
1
|
$119,500
|
$119,500
|
$119,500
|
0
|
|
|
|
Patio Home
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - WEST LITTLE ROCK (NORTHWEST)
|
1
|
$170,000
|
$170,000
|
$170,000
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total
|
1
|
$170,000
|
$170,000
|
$170,000
|
56
|
|
Sold Before Listed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condo/Townhse/Duplex/Apt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - WEST LITTLE ROCK (CENTRAL)
|
1
|
$200,000
|
$200,000
|
$200,000
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total
|
1
|
$200,000
|
$200,000
|
$200,000
|
0
|
|
|
|
Detached
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LITTLE ROCK (HEIGHTS/HILLCREST)
|
2
|
$330,000
|
$165,000
|
$165,000
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - WEST LITTLE ROCK (NORTH)
|
1
|
$100,000
|
$100,000
|
$100,000
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
North Little Rock (CENTRAL)
|
1
|
$129,950
|
$129,950
|
$129,950
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
MAUMELLE
|
2
|
$235,250
|
$117,625
|
$117,625
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
SHERWOOD
|
1
|
$192,480
|
$192,480
|
$192,480
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
NORTH LITTLE ROCK - EAST OF I-440 TO LONOKE CTY LINE
|
2
|
$249,950
|
$124,975
|
$124,975
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total
|
9
|
$1,237,630
|
$137,514
|
$125,250
|
1
|
Tuesday, 27 January 2009
The numbers in the chart below represent Saline County’s Active Listings, Listings Under Contract, and Sold Listings during the month of December. Saline County’s absorption rate is 8.56 right now. Absorption Rate is determined by dividing the total number of Listings by the Solds in any one month period. Absorption Rate tells us that if nothing else were Listed and Market Conditions stayed the same, it would take consumers (8.56 months) to absorb all of the Listing inventory. Homes in December of 2008 in Saline County sold for 97.7% of the list price.
|
|
|
December 2008 Market Analysis - Saline County (Sold Homes Data - 12/1/2008 - 12/31/2008)
|
|
|
Status
|
Class
|
Type
|
Area
|
No. of Listings
|
Dollar Volume
|
Average Price
|
Median Price
|
Average DOM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Listings
|
830
|
$182,388,763
|
$219,745
|
$175,450
|
141
|
|
Listings Under Contract
|
120
|
$16,091,615
|
$134,097
|
$129,900
|
94
|
|
Listings Dec. 2008
|
97
|
$14,702,928
|
$151,576
|
$138,900
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Detached
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRYANT
|
37
|
$5,937,191
|
$160,465
|
$146,200
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
BENTON
|
24
|
$2,947,381
|
$122,808
|
$119,700
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
PULASKI COUNTY - RURAL (SOUTH)
|
1
|
$80,000
|
$80,000
|
$80,000
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
SHERIDAN SCHOOLS (SALINE COUNTY)
|
3
|
$455,400
|
$151,800
|
$149,900
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
BAUXITE
|
8
|
$1,118,900
|
$139,863
|
$145,250
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
GLEN ROSE
|
1
|
$40,000
|
$40,000
|
$40,000
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
HARMONY GROVE
|
7
|
$840,804
|
$120,115
|
$99,900
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
PULASKI SPECIAL (SALINE COUNTY)
|
1
|
$47,900
|
$47,900
|
$47,900
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
HOT SPRINGS VILLAGE (FOUNTAIN LAKE SD)
|
6
|
$1,450,500
|
$241,750
|
$267,000
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total
|
88
|
$12,918,076
|
$146,796
|
$137,300
|
100
|
|
|
|
Mobile/Mod/Mfg w/Property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRYANT
|
2
|
$130,000
|
$65,000
|
$65,000
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total
|
2
|
$130,000
|
$65,000
|
$65,000
|
51
|
|
|
|
Rural Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHERIDAN SCHOOLS (SALINE COUNTY)
|
1
|
$155,000
|
$155,000
|
$155,000
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total
|
1
|
$155,000
|
$155,000
|
$155,000
|
22
|
|
Sold Before Listed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Detached
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRYANT
|
2
|
$301,500
|
$150,750
|
$150,750
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
SHERIDAN SCHOOLS (SALINE COUNTY)
|
1
|
$225,000
|
$225,000
|
$225,000
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
HOT SPRINGS VILLAGE (FOUNTAIN LAKE SD)
|
3
|
$973,352
|
$324,451
|
$343,852
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total
|
6
|
$1,499,852
|
$249,975
|
$219,250
|
0
|
Wednesday, 14 January 2009
America's Strongest Housing Markets
by Deborah Orr
Friday, January 9, 2009
Even in the country's most resilient areas, 2009 prices are expected to fall flat.
The housing boom passed right over Little Rock, Ark.
So has the bust.
This quiet mountain metropolis of just over 675,000 saw none of the wild speculation of former boomtowns like Las Vegas or Miami, nor the ruined fortunes that followed. Of course, Little Rock isn't completely isolated from the recent housing downturn. There are 200 foreclosures in the works, according to Trulia.com, an online real estate data provider. Developers are scrapping new housing projects, and sales activity froze in the third quarter.
But housing prices in Little Rock don't look likely to fall by more than about 1% by the middle of next year. That's because they never climbed like they did in the rest of the country. In fact, 1% is about how much they have risen in the last year.
It's the same story for McAllen, Texas, Syracuse, N.Y., Pittsburgh, Buffalo, N.Y., and El Paso, Texas. They top the list of the country's strongest real estate markets, in part because, like Little Rock, "none ... participated in the housing boom," says Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Economy.com. "Some are down just because the economy is bad."
Behind the Numbers
To compile this list, we asked Moody's Economy.com to compile a list of the country's real estate markets that are nearest to recovery. Moody's looked at the country's Census-defined metro areas--including metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas--with populations over 500,000, and prepared forecasts through 2011. They then compared them to prices in the second quarter of 2008, which are the latest figures available, to calculate how far prices will likely fall before reaching bottom.
Not one metro area will see prices increase before the end of this year, according to Zandi's forecasts. The strongest metro areas will be flat at best--but that's better than the 15% drop Moody's expects on average in the U.S. Prices won't start to pick up again until late this year or sometime next year even in the strongest markets.
That's because there are countervailing forces at work. The job market is weakening all over. On the other hand, new housing starts are down, which should help reduce supply--eventually. And, at just over 5% for a conforming 30-year mortgage, interest rates are lower than they've been in more than 35 years.
Texas markets are most set to benefit. Housing values were rising in many Lone Star State towns until oil futures collapsed and agricultural commodity prices fell. But the bottom doesn't look very deep. Moody's forecasts no change for McAllen and a fall of less than 3% for Dallas, Fort Worth, El Paso, San Antonio and Houston.
"Texas has the best large-state economy in the country right now," says Zandi. "Employment is slowing, but its still growing."
It's a similar story in Tulsa, Okla., where housing prices look like they will dip 1% this year after steady recent appreciation. With the price of crude falling, that's no surprise in this city built on oil. What's more surprising is how little values rose over the last decade; the average house in Tulsa changes hands for around $131,000, according to Trulia.com, compared to $100,000 in 2004.
New Orleans is another market that was relatively robust until the national downturn cast a shadow on local prices. Money poured into the Big Easy after Katrina destroyed the city and a long, slow renaissance began. Housing prices popped 13.7% in the third quarter of last year compared to a year earlier, according to Zillow.com, $135,000 on average. Moody's is forecasting a fall of 2% this year.
And just like Little Rock, housing markets in upstate New York never had the ups and downs of some hot markets in the rest of the country. In Rochester, the birthplace of industrial ancients Xerox and Eastman Kodak, real estate values have climbed at a steady 3% rate for the last five years. They don't have far to fall--about 2.4% according to Moody's forecasts. In Buffalo, Syracuse and Albany, prices should also remain steady this year.
It's a similar story for the old industrial town of Pittsburgh, Pa. The city built on steel had its crisis two decades ago. Now, it's one of America's cleanest cities. Carnegie Mellon University attracts some of the best and brightest students, and some of the old steel mills are being converted to research parks. Pittsburgh is grayer than most cities: 16% of the population is over 65, well above the national average of 12%. Retirees, living on social security and pensions, are less affected by job losses.
Housing prices ended the third quarter at a median $122,000, about where they have been for the last three years, according to data from the National Association of Realtors. Moody's forecasts more of the same for this year.
With so many markets in sunnier places crashing and burning, being dull has its advantages.
Copyrighted, Forbes.com. All rights reserved.
Wednesday, 17 December 2008
Pulaski County – November Market Analysis and Absorption Rate Figures
The numbers in the chart below represent Pulaski County’s Active Listings, Listings Under Contract, and Sold Listings during the month of November. Pulaski County’s absorption rate is 11.8 right now. Absorption Rate is determined by dividing the total number of Listings by the Solds in any one month period. Absorption Rate tells us that if nothing else were Listed and Market Conditions stayed the same, it would take consumers (11.8 months) to absorb all of the Listing inventory.
|
November Market Analysis - Pulaski County (Sold Homes Data - 11/1/2008 - 11/30/2008)
|
|
|
Status
|
Class
|
Type
|
Area
|
No. of Listings
|
Dollar Volume
|
Average Price
|
Median Price
|
Average DOM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Listings
|
2880
|
$692,549,164
|
$240,468
|
$173,200
|
140
|
|
Listings Under Contract
|
312
|
$61,863,402
|
$198,280
|
$136,450
|
76
|
|
Listings Sold Nov. 2008
|
244
|
$38,731,252
|
$158,735
|
$133,750
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condo/Townhse/Duplex/Apt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - WEST LITTLE ROCK (NORTH)
|
3
|
$708,500
|
$236,167
|
$250,000
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - WEST LITTLE ROCK (NORTHWEST)
|
2
|
$195,000
|
$97,500
|
$97,500
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total
|
5
|
$903,500
|
$180,700
|
$153,500
|
172
|
|
|
|
Detached
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LITTLE ROCK (DOWNTOWN)
|
8
|
$186,500
|
$23,313
|
$19,750
|
245
|
|
|
|
|
LITTLE ROCK (HEIGHTS/HILLCREST)
|
10
|
$2,927,300
|
$292,730
|
$159,750
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
LITTLE ROCK (UALR)
|
5
|
$304,150
|
$60,830
|
$60,000
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - WEST LITTLE ROCK (NORTH)
|
25
|
$5,076,700
|
$203,068
|
$148,000
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - WEST LITTLE ROCK (CENTRAL)
|
11
|
$1,235,500
|
$112,318
|
$104,000
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - WEST LITTLE ROCK (NORTHWEST)
|
32
|
$7,187,338
|
$224,604
|
$204,000
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - SOUTHWEST LITTLE ROCK (CENTRAL)
|
4
|
$271,500
|
$67,875
|
$66,500
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - SOUTHWEST LITTLE ROCK (SOUTH)
|
16
|
$1,091,400
|
$68,213
|
$68,000
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
NORTH LITTLE ROCK (WEST/CRYSTAL HILL)
|
15
|
$1,129,801
|
$75,320
|
$84,000
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
North Little Rock (CENTRAL)
|
11
|
$1,715,300
|
$155,936
|
$120,000
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
NORTH LITTLE ROCK (DOWNTOWN/EAST)
|
6
|
$258,051
|
$43,009
|
$23,450
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
JACKSONVILLE
|
17
|
$1,804,200
|
$106,129
|
$123,000
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
BRYANT
|
1
|
$135,000
|
$135,000
|
$135,000
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
PULASKI COUNTY WEST
|
9
|
$2,594,550
|
$288,283
|
$287,900
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
MAUMELLE
|
21
|
$4,367,312
|
$207,967
|
$185,000
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
LIT - OTTER CREEK, WESTFIELD & SURROUNDING AREAS
|
4
|
$629,400
|
$157,350
|
$147,500
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
SHERWOOD
|
24
|
$3,661,000
|
$152,542
|
| |
|